May 24, 2016

THE HISTORY OF INDOMIE IN NIGERIA



This work is copied from different sources and the references are listed below. I only collated and structure this information. The take away is my original contribution to this article.
Indomie is a brand of instant noodle by Indofood, the largest instant noodle manufacturer in Indonesia with 72% of market share. It is distributed in Australia, Asia, Africa, New Zealand, the United States, Canada and European and Middle Eastern countries. "Indo" stands for "Indonesia" and "mie" stands for "noodles" in the Indonesian language, therefore "Indomie" stands for "noodles from Indonesia or Indonesian noodle". Both Indomie and IndoMie can be used to describe the brand.  
Indomie has come a long way since its humble beginnings in the 1970's. Our noodles are made from carefully selected ingredients, the best quality flour and fresh spices from the natural resources of Indonesia giving it a unique and delicious taste.
Indomie was first produced in the 1970's with the classic Chicken Flavoured Noodles. In 1983, Indomie Mi Goreng was introduced and has since become a favourite. Indomie is now a household brand name that everybody loves and has grown up with and has become part of their staple food. Indomie is available in 80 countries around the world including Australia, America, The Netherlands, Germany, Hong Kong, China, Dubai, Nigeria, and many more.
Indomie comes in many different varieties, the most popular is Mi Goreng. It literally means Fried Noodles, but without all the fuss. It’s ready in an instant for your convenience. Simply cook the noodles, drain and then add all the seasonings in. Indomie has since launched a Mi Goreng range including Barbeque Chicken, Satay, Hot & Spicy and Rendang Spicy Beef. Indomie also has a classic flavour, the Special Chicken, which is best eaten with broth. Whichever Indomie flavour you feel like, give them a go and we hope that Indomie will become your favourite noodles too.
In 1988 Indomie was introduced in Nigeria through import, and in 1995 open its first production factory in Nigeria under Dufil Prima Foods. Dufil, a joint venture between Salim Group, the Indonesian conglomerate that owns the Indomie brand, and Tolaram Group of Singapore, struggled in its early years. It is the first instant noodles manufacturing plant in Nigeria and the largest in Africa. Indomie Instant Noodles has grown to become a household name across the country. Indomie is produced in Nigeria since 1995 where it is a popular brand and has the largest instant noodle manufacturing plant in Africa. Since 2003, Dufil’s fortunes shifted and its revenues have increased at an average rate of almost 30 per cent a year. One reason is the heavy marketing focus. The company’s advertisements appear on buses and buildings around the country. Mothers with young children are a particular target market. One of Dufil’s popular catchlines reads: “No mama be like you, no noodles be like Indomie”.

TAKE AWAY
1.      The ability to leverage and raise capital internally can never be over emphasized for any firm that wants to grow
2.      Partnership should be embraced if it will lead to something better
3.      The reality that foreigners are making it in Nigeria shows that locals can also make it
4.       Nigeria is a consumption oriented country

REFERENCES

May 23, 2016

MY MEDITATION ON THE BIBLE 001

2 Chronicles: the book was written byEzra
The book has a total of 36 chapters, 822 verses and 26,069 words.
It gives a chronological account of the different Kings that ruled in Israel and then. After the death of King Solomon, the united Kingdom of Israel was divided into two with Rehoboam, a hardworking servant of King Solomon taking 10 tribes and retained the name Israel and Rehoboam  the son of King Solomon, took Judah and Benjamin.
This occurrence even corroborates what King Solomon said (Because to every purpose there is time and judgment, therefore the misery of man is great upon him. For he knoweth not that which shall be: for who can tell him when it shall be? Ecclesiastes 8: 6 and 7)
In the land of Judah, the following were the name of Kings that ruled: Rehoboam, Abijah, Asa, Jehosaphat, Jehoram, Ahaziah, Jehoash, Amaziah, Uzziah, Jotham, Aham, Hezekiah, Manasseh, Amon, Josiah, Jehoahaz, Jehoiakim, Jehoiachin, Zedekiah
In the land of Israel, the following were the name of Kings that ruled: Jeroboam, Nadab, Baasha, Zimri, Omri, Ahab, Ahaziah, Jehoram, Jehu, Jehoahaz, Jehoash, Jeroboam II, Zechariah, Shallum, Menahem, Pekahiah, Pekah, HOshea
 WHAT WE LEARN
1.      One thing was common whenever a King fears and honours God the covenant of peace and rest was given to him by God
2.      Sometimes a present King serve the Lord whole heartedly but the immediate King goes into great sin
3.      Sometimes a present King disobeys the Lord whole heartedly but the immediate King goes into great obedience
4.      A king disobeys God and live long; another disobeys God and lives a short life. The King that lived long have the opportunity to repent, the King that died early die in rebellion to God
5.      God always send warning before destruction
6.      Some King serves the Lord while a Priest was alive but after the demise of the Priest the King backslides.
7.      Some King serve the Lord but not with a perfect heart
8.      Sin is punished and Righteousness is rewarded
9.      The King that opens their treasury to the enemy lost it to the enemy
10.  The Kings that trusted in other Kings were destroyed and reprimanded by God for putting their trust in man
11.  Israel descended from Grace to grass
OUR TAKE AWAY
1.      Serve God faithfully and He will give us His covenant of peace and rest.
2.      We should not compare others to ourselves because we are individually answerable to God
3.      No matter how long God postpone his judgment on our sinful behaviour one day our hen will come to roost and God’s judgment will be passed on all sinners.
4.      Never allow the enemy to infiltrate your God given space lest you lose the space to the enemy
5.      Never put your trust in man (Psalm 118 : 7 and 8)
6.      Israel sudden descend from Grace to grass shows that anyone can descend once we look away from God


 


REFERENCES

May 17, 2016

WHAT QUALIFIES A LIFER MARRIAGE AS GOD’S WILL OR GOD’S WITNESS



DEFINITION OF TERMS:
God’s Will: The belief that a couple was perfectly chosen by God.
God’s witness: The belief that a couple was not perfectly chosen by God but though married should not divorce because God hate divorce. It is an indirect way of saying the couple are not God’s will.
Lifer: Member of Deeper Christian Life Ministry.
LM: Deeper Christian Life Ministry.

I am opportune to be born a Lifer. I am a post NYSC graduate and by expectations I should get married soon. This expectation has increased the number of advice and admonition I have been receiving on marital issues. Amidst the advice, I found a correlation that arouses my analytical mind, ‘marriage in LM equals God’s will’
Is it LM that makes my marriage God’s will or...? This query of mine had led to this write-up, which weeks to find answers that last. I know this is not peculiar to LM because no organisation is perfect.
This write-up is not about marriage, denominations, how to choose God’s will in marriage, marriage of non-lifers, marriages in other denominations, your ideal partner but an honest query as to how lifer qualifies marriage. What qualifies a Lifer’s marriage as  God’s will or God’s witness:

Because the wedding was held in LM!
Because you go through LM marriage committee!
Because you are match make by God!

I am strongly persuaded that the third option is the perfect option. I cannot give a confirmatory assertion to a marriage as either God’s will or God’s witness except the couple involved though am not neglecting the possibility of confirmatory revelation from other sources but am of the subjective opinion that the couple are the best respondent to whether their marriage is God’s will or God’s witness.
Over my few short years, I have witness some marriage ceremonies. I have heard the assertion this is God’s will when a lifer marries in LM and sometimes this is God’s witness when a lifer marries in another denomination. I am not giving myself a clean sheet on this sceptical reasoning because I used to be of this opinion myself but my inquisitive mind has queried this opinion as unfounded. A church should not qualify or stamp a marriage as God’s will or God’s witness but rather God.
The marriage ceremony of a family friend that I attended of lately; who is a lifer but did not marry in LM has necessitated the penning of this write-up.
He is a fine young man raised in LM and by God grace a Christian (many attests to his Christian lifestyle). He is a lifer till date but did not marry in LM. His profession allows him the opportunity to convene LM programme at the group level; his dad is one of the pastor in the group and he was a potential pastor that will soon take over the baton from our fast aging parents. When his wedding was announced, (It was not announced in the church, we were family friends and got an IV on that basis) I saw the shame, shock, regret, betrayal and embarrassment in some lifers’ eyes who are mostly the leaders in the group. They knew the young man and his family and were expecting a LM marriage because ‘marriage in LM equals God’s will’ or perhaps what could have led to the great and surprising embarrassment among the leaders eyes.
My memory at this point was quick in reminding me of my personal ambition of marrying a lady from LM (because of my personal idea of raising my children in a home where parents belief are in unison and not differentiated) and also ensuring that the marriage ceremony was done in another denomination. I am in a dilemma.
I was at this point determined to attend the marriage ceremony and have a fore taste of how my marriage will be classified, if not done in LM.
At the wedding, I saw dejection amidst the dancing, shame behind the shine in the eyes of some lifers that were in attendance, almost all the lifers wished he had married in LM. I am not challenging that feeling because it is expected but the aftermath of classifying the marriage as God’s witness because it was not in conducted in LM is my line of objection. I asked myself some questions during the marriage ceremony:
Do you mean this young man did not acknowledge God before choosing his life partner?
Do you mean God did not assert this marriage?
Do you mean if I marry a lady that is not a lifer then I have made a mistake in marriage?
Do you mean if I did not go through LM marriage committee then my marriage is God’s witness?

These questions bring to my mind a movie I watched, titled: our family wedding. One of the line in the movie reads ‘our marriage their wedding’
I know parents dream about their children marriage ceremony and wish that the children will actualise those dreams but when such dream are not actualised, should we sentenced the children to an eternity of shame and condemnation with the infusing emotions that they have make a grave mistake in life all because they never wedded in LM? (Am not supporting unequal yoke but arguing on behalf of christian marriage between lifers or one lifer and someone from another denomination, whose wedding ceremony was conducting in another denomination apart from LM).
Now we are on earth and we see through a glass that is dark but when we get to heaven we will see clearly but it is on earth that I will marry not in heaven and my question is, what qualifies a marriage as God’s will or God’s witness?